Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:57:16 +0900
- From: Michael Doughty <Doughty_Michael@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- References: <1026283205.5594.6.camel@example.com><200207101553.25489.mauro.sauco@example.com><vAF-pB.A.AWE.QQNL9@example.com><20020711095047.2ac2fcc5.Doughty_Michael@example.com><NchQMB.A.tbE.s0NL9@example.com><20020711110248.31cc5965.Doughty_Michael@example.com><1026354946.5984.56.camel@example.com><OnNln.A.32E.lOPL9@example.com><20020711123733.1d072fa2.Doughty_Michael@example.com><kHdNEB.A.sQF.TEQL9@example.com>
On 11 Jul 2002 12:54:11 +0900, bruno raoult wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 12:37, Michael Doughty wrote: > > Umm. That was 'ls -ldi'. The first column is the inode. > > > Maybe. We had only a few levels. I am probably wrong, but FS type should > be cheched. > <the above re-ordered for my sanity> I agree that for lsattr filesystem is a factor and I should not have assumed that it was ext[2|3], but that has no bearing on whether ls -ldi returns the inode or not. Michael
- References:
- [tlug] everlasting directory
- From: Eric O. Flores
- Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- From: Mauro Sauco
- Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- From: Michael Doughty
- Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- From: Michael Doughty
- Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- From: Eric O. Flores
- Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- From: Michael Doughty
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] everlasting directory
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links