Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:16:18 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C9840752059DA8D4@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <tNhFXB.A.6AB.WGDM7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
> Good/bad/indifferent? Does it build 64-bit binaries on Solaris? Does it > have K7 optimizations on x86? Does it suck? etc... See some excerpts below from the release announcement. I'm planning on adding it to my test system, as one of my projects has been running into bugs in g++ 2.97.2. Darren http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/features.html http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/caveats.html ... While we feel that GCC 3.0 is suitable for production use... We do not recommend replacing the system compiler on your system with GCC 3.0, because that makes it difficult for you to downgrade, should the need arise. ... We also know that current versions of GLIBC do not work when recompiled with GCC 3.0. The GLIBC developers are working on solving this problem.
- References:
- opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- Next by Date: Re: Yahoo & Softbank to start ADSL service
- Prev by thread: Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- Next by thread: Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links