Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:09:13 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- Organization: Kobe University, Japan
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C9840752059DA8D4@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <gp126.A.1y.mFCM7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: boti
Scott Stone wrote: > well, I'm mirroring ftp.gnu.org onto one of my servers at home, as well as > ftp.sunfreeware.com, and I noticed that both of them picked up gcc-3.0.0 > this morning. > > I haven't looked at the Changelog yet, but it seems from my experience that > the Changelog isn't the Whole Story - anyone used this thing yet? > Good/bad/indifferent? Does it build 64-bit binaries on Solaris? Does it > have K7 optimizations on x86? Does it suck? etc... I haven't tried it yet, but I've read some comments on Slashdot. They say it compiles the kernel but it does oops in some cases. I'll stay away from it for a while. -- B0Ti.
- References:
- opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
- opinions of gcc 3.0
- Prev by Date: RH7.1 ja vs en?
- Next by Date: Re: Yahoo & Softbank to start ADSL service
- Prev by thread: opinions of gcc 3.0
- Next by thread: Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |