Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
opinions of gcc 3.0
- To: "'tlug@example.com'" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:59:26 -0700
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <KIo5oC.A.g2H.md-L7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
well, I'm mirroring ftp.gnu.org onto one of my servers at home, as well as ftp.sunfreeware.com, and I noticed that both of them picked up gcc-3.0.0 this morning. I haven't looked at the Changelog yet, but it seems from my experience that the Changelog isn't the Whole Story - anyone used this thing yet? Good/bad/indifferent? Does it build 64-bit binaries on Solaris? Does it have K7 optimizations on x86? Does it suck? etc... ----------------------------------------------------- Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com> Senior Technical Consultant - UNIX and Networking Taos, the Sysadmin Company - Santa Clara, CA
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
- Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- From: Uva Coder <uvacoder@example.com>
- Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- Prev by Date: Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- Next by Date: Re: Yahoo & Softbank to start ADSL service
- Prev by thread: RE: Yahoo & Softbank to start ADSL service
- Next by thread: Re: opinions of gcc 3.0
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |