Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Neil Booth <neil@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:48:55 +0000
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010323105814.B7869@example.com>; from wileyc@example.com on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 10:58:14AM +0900
- References: <01032005050600.01926@example.com> <20010321102733.A24750@example.com> <20010321111743.L3408@example.com> <20010321114424.C24750@example.com> <s3tu24nl695.fsf@example.com> <20010322130705.B18516@example.com> <s3ty9txioyd.fsf@example.com> <20010323105814.B7869@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <FS7Qj.A.mHF.t_vu6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
Christopher SEKIYA wrote:- > <rant> > > glibc is _way_ too dependent on egcs/binutils snapshots. glibc is starting > to remind me of HJ's libc. That's something that I _never_ thought I would > say. > > </rant> Not to mention being incestuous with undocumented features of GCC. It's way too macro-ized for my liking as well. Damn near everything is a macro, as an "optimisation". Except that the macros are an unmaintainable mess, and have bugs, and appear to pessimize the code that GCC creates rather than optimize it... With -O1 or higher, all the string functions become some godawful 1000-or-so token macro expansion. If you have string functions nested within string functions, you can easily get one line of C code expand into millions of tokens (this happens for one line in GCC, in intl/dcgettext.c, which has stpcpy 4 levels deep). It's a bit out of control; IMO they should concentrate on a nice tight libc like those in *BSD. Neil.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- References:
- ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: CSD <aim@example.com>
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Mike Fabian <mfabian@example.com>
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Mike Fabian <mfabian@example.com>
- Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: The fiddler
- Next by Date: Re: The fiddler
- Prev by thread: Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- Next by thread: Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links