TLUG Mailing List

Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

To: tlug@example.com

Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:45:42 +0000

Content-Disposition: inline

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

In-Reply-To: <20001113223437.A855@example.com>; from wileyc@example.com on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:34:37PM +0900

References: <MABBIDMAKKBPLOLJGGBDAEPMCAAA.j-morgan@example.com> <3A0EBE65.9B4840D9@example.com> <20001113223437.A855@example.com>

Reply-To: tlug@example.com

Resent-From: tlug@example.com

Resent-Message-ID: <OlBoy.A.6nC.NC_D6@example.com>

Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com

Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>

User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 10:34:37PM +0900, Christopher Sekiya wrote:
> What license is bash distributed under?  Which license is *BSD distributed
> under?  Why wouldn't a *BSD distribute non-BSD-licensed code?

While the BSD Bourne Shell is obviously the Right Thing, licensing is
irrelevant here; *BSD includes both BSD licenses and GPL'd code, and so-called
GNU systems include both BSD licensed and GPL'd code. 

-- 
FAILURE:
    When Your Best Just Isn't Good Enough

                                                    http://www.despair.com
Follow-Ups:

Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>

Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>

References:

FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: "Jack Morgan" <j-morgan@example.com>

Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: Sorin Savastre <sors@example.com>

Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>

Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

Prev by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

Index(es):

Date

Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links