TLUG Mailing List

Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

To: tlug@example.com

Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>

Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:34:37 +0900

Content-Disposition: inline

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

In-Reply-To: <3A0EBE65.9B4840D9@example.com>; from sors@example.com on Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 05:59:33PM +0200

References: <MABBIDMAKKBPLOLJGGBDAEPMCAAA.j-morgan@example.com> <3A0EBE65.9B4840D9@example.com>

Reply-To: tlug@example.com

Resent-From: tlug@example.com

Resent-Message-ID: <gbQrqB.A.ajC.y3-D6@example.com>

Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com

User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 05:59:33PM +0200, Sorin Savastre wrote:

> FreeBSD is very restrictive with the hardware and is not very friendly.

Nope.  It's just not as watered-down with EZ-admin-toolz as RedHat.

> Also I don't no why standard distribution is coming with sh not bash like
> shell.

Which came first, bash or sh?  What license is bash distributed under?  Which
license is *BSD distributed under?  Why wouldn't a *BSD distribute
non-BSD-licensed code?

-- Chris
Follow-Ups:

Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>

Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: Austin Kurahone <austin@example.com>

References:

FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: "Jack Morgan" <j-morgan@example.com>

Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
From: Sorin Savastre <sors@example.com>

Prev by Date: Fonts

Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

Prev by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux

Index(es):

Date

Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links