Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- From: Dave Gutteridge <dave@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 18:31:57 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- In-Reply-To: <000701be501f$d8c2b5c0$ac146285@example.com>
- References: <1294007839-117496363@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>Subject: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same >>problem twice? >Mutation, no doubt... Uh oh... mutants on my hard drive. That doesn't sound promising.... >More and better beer, of course! Mmmm... beer. >What is your actual Video Ram? Usually server finds it anyhow, but it >doesn't hurt to have it listed here. I'm pretty sure it's 1MB VRAM, which is what Xconfigurator suggested to me, and what I selected... which means it's weird that it is commented out in the XF86config file. SHould I uncomment the line which states my cards VRAM? >># ********************************************************************** >># Screen sections >># ********************************************************************** >># The Colour SVGA server >>Section "Screen" >> Driver "svga" >> Device "Generic VGA" >> #Device "TG 9660 / Cyber9385" >> Monitor "MAG MX15F (1)" >> Subsection "Display" >> Depth 8 >> #Modes "1024x768" >> ViewPort 0 0 >> Virtual 320 200 >> #Virtual 1024 768 >> EndSubsection >>EndSection > >Well, it's pretty clear here. You have the virtual display set to 320x200 and >no actual mode available, so you get 320x200. Try uncommenting the mode above >of 1024x768, nuke the "Virtual 320 200" line, and you'll have 1024x768 next >time up. I'll try it just as you suggest, but I had previously experimented before, and I think what you said is one of the variations I went through. If I uncomment the "Mode 1024X768" line, it comes back with an error saying that there isn't enough VRAM>. So then I uncomment the line which says "Device "TG 9660 / Cyber9385"", and comment out the line which says "Device "Generic VGA"", and I get a crazy screen of jittery lines. >Another utility is XF86Setup, which is a GUI style of X configuration. You'll >need the VGA16 server to use it. Ah, a different configurator. That sounds promising. I'll give that a shot tonight as well. Thanks David Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: February 13 (Sat), 12:30 place: Temple Univ. ** presentation: XEmacs, by Steven Baur and Martin Buchholz Next Nomikai: March 19 (Fri), 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- From: "Totoro" <riley@example.com>
- RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- From: Dave Gutteridge <dave@example.com>
- RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- From: "Totoro" <riley@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- Next by Date: RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- Prev by thread: RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- Next by thread: RE: tlug: Grrr... Why won't the same solution work for the same problem twice?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links