Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: HTML again
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: Matt Gushee <matt@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 18:54:33 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981022180901.20295p-100000@example.com>
- References: <3.0.6.32.19981022174544.0097e2b0@example.com><001901bdfd73$137f2d10$82ab91d2@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981022114259.5197A-100000@example.com><13870.57864.592512.386694@example.com><199810220906.SAA19924@example.com><3.0.6.32.19981022181823.0097c820@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981022180901.20295p-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Scott Stone writes: > > > a waste of bandwidth. The HTML standard doesn't specify it as required. > > > > HTML 4.0 does. Better get used to it. > > why? Nothing enforces it. Okay, maybe "better" is putting it too strongly. Would you feel better if I said "should"? Darren Cook writes: > Maybe this is coming back to the purpose of your site. If you put > alt="icon" then when the user moves their mouse over it the word icon pops > up. I mostly work on sites where guys with pony tails argue over the > aesthetics of whether an image should be 190 or 195 pixels wide, and having > "icon" pop up just ruins the whole atmosphere. :-). I see your point. I'm not sure the popup thing for ALTs is good design on the part of the browser makers. Personally, I dislike anything that pops up unless I asked it to. > > On documentation and information sites you don't have gratuitous images > like this, so every image deserves an ALT. That, too. > >HTML 4.0 does. Better get used to it. > > O'Reilly's Definitive Guide To HTML describes it as optional but > recommended for most images. I think that's out of date. My source is the HTML 4.0 DTD, which I obtained directly from the W3C. I don't really want to argue about ALT tags. Granted, there are times when they're unnecessary. But it is in the standard. And one of the main reasons HTML is as hard to write as it is, is that the browser makers chose to disregard the standards and defined their own dialects of HTML. Now we have HTML 4.0, which is well-thought out, supported (at least nominally) by both Netscape and Microsoft, and by the way, very readable. It's surely imperfect, as all standards are. But it is perhaps the only hope we have of restoring some kind of sanity to web production. Of course, it's primarily up to the browser makers to comply with the standard. But I also think that authors and website maintainers have a civic duty ;-) to understand the standard, to use it, and to keep the big guys honest. Matt Gushee Oshamanbe, Hokkaido --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 12 December, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: "John De Hoog" <dehoog@example.com>
- RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: Matt Gushee <matt@example.com>
- RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- RE: tlug: HTML again
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: A message to the "Old Guard" - was "HTML again"
- Next by Date: tlug: IMG ALT tags
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: HTML again
- Next by thread: RE: tlug: HTML again
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links