Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: Dave`s concerns/Frank`s suggestion (was: `Old Guard`)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: Dave`s concerns/Frank`s suggestion (was: `Old Guard`)
- From: tjhaslam <tjhaslam@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 17:41:33 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Dave wrote: Dave >This is something i kind of mentioned in my other posting Dave > what TJH here might refer to as the real "Linux community" Be careful here. The Linux community ``bit`` has been an ongoing going debate for some time now on this list. I do NOT limit the `real` community, whatever `real` might mean here, presumably to programmers and GNU-ers. Since, of course, I am neither myself. Nor am I a *member* by the standards perviously stated by Chris and by Stephen Turnbull. Dave>TJH has valid point here that the definition of the "Linux community" is in Dave> question. Thanks but NO thanks. I don`t think the ``defintion is in question``. I think the __community itself__ is undergoing a massive change, and that people like yourself and myself are the `vanguard`, as it were of that change. I discussed this on the TLUG list at hideous length earlier, and I`m not interested in repeating myself because it`s boring to me and more boring to everyone else. More simply, I think that people like myself and yourself DO have a lot to offer the Linux community, even as Chris and ST have defined it. BUT _not_ in the currency they have been trading back and forth for the past several years: code/hacks. Despite what I think that people like myself--and presumably yourself--can offer, the Win/Mac transients, however, do bring some very different expectations and attitudes. In other words, we have some adjustment to do. So does the `old guard.` Expect this to be a messy and occasionally ugly process. All things considered, and all the things that can go wrong, I think that TLUG is handling it rather well. Chris`s objections, however, make perfect sense to me even if I strongly *disagree* with him on a number of related points--points that I`ve already beaten to death. (If you really care, search the archive). It was Eric Raymond who described the Open Source Community as having *a gift economy*--I suggest you read or re-read his classic `The cathedral and the bazaar`. Linux has become what it is because people were willing to share, to help each other out. Any surprise that some of these *members* see people like ME--and too a much lesser extent, perhaps even you--as showing up empty-handed, and then whining, complaining, and demanding services. If I`m paying people to develop for me, I expect to call the shots. If people are volunteering their time, and effort, and expertise, I can NOT expect to be their BOSS and I certainly should NOT piss all over their efforts. __Sensitivity works both ways here__. Dave> I have Linux installed on my machine, and want to use it more Right. Same here. Dave> but i am incapable of developing for it. Right. For the indefinite future, same here. Dave> It would seem that by TJH's standards, i am NOT Dave> a part of the "Linux community". Wrong. I defined _quite well_ my position on this topic in several posts to the list. Don`t misrepresent me. Dave> Does that mean that I Dave> shouldn't be here in this list? Chris claims he should not be on the list. And he`s a programmer/ developer. I`m on the list because I want to learn more about Linux. Chris is someone who knows a great deal about Linux--and a far more valuable list member than I am. If he feels that people like me are driving him off the list, then we have problem. Wakarimasu ka? Dave>If so, then where would a person like me go Dave> when i want to learn more abuot Linux? I`ll assume you mean besides the TLUG list, which I do not suggest--on even imply--you drop. I am suggesting you do some work, some research on Linux and even GNU, to understand better what you`re encountering in way of expectations, attitudes, shared knowledge, et cetera. Linux is a different culture. I`m suggesting not deference but simple respect. Frank Bennett writes: FB> Maybe it's time to start thinking about weakly subdividing FB> the TLUG mailing list? Yes. I think so. Possible subdivisions: Commerical Development News; Linux Philosophy; et cetera. Main purpose of the list: the tech support/sys admin info exchange that is does so well. Best to all, TJH --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 12 December, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Dave`s concerns/Frank`s suggestion (was: `Old Guard`)
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- tlug: Dave`s concerns/Frank`s suggestion (was: `Old Guard`)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: usenet news groups
- Next by Date: RE: tlug: HTML again
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: usenet news groups
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Dave`s concerns/Frank`s suggestion (was: `Old Guard`)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links