Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: NFS question
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: NFS question
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:02:31 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <19981015103326S.chak@example.com>; from Manuel M. T. Chakravarty on Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 10:33:26AM +0900
- Mail-Followup-To: tlug@example.com
- References: <19981014184620.A19261@example.com> <19981015103326S.chak@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> Manuel M. T. Chakravarty writes: (on 15 Oct 98) > Is there any reason that you don't like to use NIS? (Just > curious, because I thought that is the way to go in the > outlined setup.) It's a pretty big security hole in general, and I just despised it when SunOS used to force you to use it for hostname resolution (you had to either replace shared libraries or do it the Sun way of first querying NIS and only going to DNS if the name wasn't found). The biggest advantage to copying things to a local disk (via rdist or whatever) is that you aren't dependent on servers & networks at boot time. Personally, I like using NIS for some stuff, but I'm uncomfortable using it for important things like authentication or hostname lookups. It's a pretty nice way of replicating general purpose (key,value) databases if you aren't too concerned about security and reliability. As usual (grin) my favorite mechanism for large dbm-like (key,value) persistent hashes is a Dan Berstein original: "http://pobox.com/~djb/cdb.html". Doesn't have network replication/access features, and it's oriented to read-mostly applications, but it's useful nonetheless. Felix von Leitner (Fefe) of vim fame has a really interesting extension to cdb to make a nice "light" rdbm (i.e. no sql or heavy relational query capabilities): "http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~leitner/rdb/". Universities are most likely to benefit from storing passwd files in a dbm or cdb. If you've only got a relatively small number of users, though (~100) a simple flat file should be sufficient. Distributed authentication is really hard to do well. Most networked solutions are either insecure (NIS) or too complex (DCE). I like just moving files around because it's conceptually simple. Regards, -- Rex --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 12 December, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: NFS question
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: NFS question
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- Re: tlug: NFS question
- From: "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <chak@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: TLJ2.0 question... again
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: NFS question
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: NFS question
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: NFS question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links