Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 16:19:35 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <19981007133247.A11940@example.com>
- References: <199810062007.UAA00264@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981007092838.635C-100000@example.com><13850.57974.611501.31116@example.com><19981007133247.A11940@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Rex" == Rex Walters <rex@example.com> writes: Rex> On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 12:39:34PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull Rex> wrote: >> Paranoid structure: >> >> /dev/?da1 50 MB / >> /dev/?da2 128 MB <swap> >> /dev/?da3 50 MB /.root_mirror Rex> I also recommend this, but I caution against the word Rex> "mirror". I prefer the word "clone" or "backup". That is I Rex> don't think you're really referring to raid1 mirroring, are No, I'm not a physical FS kind of guy, I'm a logical FS (eg NFS, AFS, URL ;-) kind of guy. I'm talking about the kind of mirror that the mirror script does. I don't think of it as a "backup", because that implies to me offline/hard to access. "Clone" would be OK. Rex> Out of curiosity, how are you populating the /.root_mirror Rex> filesystem? 1. Insert distribution CD, install to /dev/hda1. 2. When I feel like it, mount /dev/hda3, and do cp -options `find / -xdev` /.root_mirror/ or something like that. I don't need to be _that_ paranoid. "When I feel like it" = when /etc/passwd changes (very inconvenient for other users if I miss this), or when I install new packages. Rex> My approach would probably be to unmount it, dd from ?da1 to Rex> ?da3 when you "know" (hmmphf) nothing is being modified in /, Rex> then fsck ?da3 to be sure and remount. Too much trouble; I just do a sync, diff, umount, and fsck. I don't need a true clone, just something that's close enough to get rolling again; the housekeeping data that dpkg and rpm et al keep is in /var, and there's very little in /etc that would _kill_ me if I corrupted a file. I use backups (as defined above) to deal with /var and /home, and try hard to avoid polluting /usr and /playpen with locally generated data. As long as I've still got /, I've still got the localhost hardware services (eg, I only have one floppy tape drive, should I ever need it) and can get to the net for other hosts. Rex> The only thing that's missing to be able to accomplish the Rex> same thing with a Linux system is the ability to "clone" an Rex> ext2 filesystem reliably. On an Auspex, ax_clonefs will Rex> ensure that any modifications that occur while the copy is Rex> running are handled correctly (there is actually a brief Rex> lockout at the very end to ensure that all metadata is Rex> synched on both sides correctly). That sounds like a very hard problem without designing the fs around that requirement from the ground up. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +1 (298) 53-5091 --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: karlmax@example.com (Karl-Max Wagner)
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Prev by thread: tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Re: root mirror (was: LILO Vs. 1024??)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links