Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 09:32:22 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <199810062007.UAA00264@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Karl-Max Wagner wrote: >Check that the bootdevice in lilo.conf is given as /dev/xxx >WITHOUT (!!!!!!!!!!!) a number behind it. In this case LILO >installs in the MBR. If you give a number it installs in the That part seems OK. Here's my lilo.conf. Does anything seem wrong with it? The disk has two partitions on it. The first is a 64 meg swap partition, and the second is all the rest, which Linux is installed in. boot=/dev/hda map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot.b prompt timeout=50 image=/boot/vmlinuz label=linux root=/dev/hda2 read-only Thanks, Jonathan Byrne Media and Content Section 3Web - Your Internet Solution! <URL:http://www.threeweb.ad.jp/index.en.html> 3Web Channel <URL: http://www.3web.co.jp/index.en.html> --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: karlmax@example.com (Karl-Max Wagner)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links