Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: JB's NJWIN note (was: Re: tlug: Netscape and RH5.0)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: JB's NJWIN note (was: Re: tlug: Netscape and RH5.0)
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 16:48:20 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980827155350.508B-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Eric S. Standlee wrote: >Is there no similar program on the Linux side? It seems that it cannot be >that hard to do what NJWIN does: trap two-bit languages and translate MS Visual Basic is a two-bit language :-) CJK are double-byte languages. Completely different animal :-) I have my sights set even higher: MacOS features the Japanese Language Kit, which not only enables English applications for Japanese use (and there are similar kits for the other double-byte languages), but enanbles English MacOS to run quite a few Japanese apps. The Windows 95/NT side of the fence features TwinBridge and a couple of work-alikes that do the same thing as Apple's JLK, except AFAIK they don't enable you to run Japanese apps. I've used TwinBridge, and it's very good, the next best thing to actually having a Japanese Windows system. The above CJK solutions work on a system-wide level that lets you put double-byte input into any app, and display it in any app. On KanjiTalk (Japanese MacOS) and the Japanese flavors of Windows and (presumably) OS/2, they will attempt to put Japanese into any app, whether it's a Japanese-localized one or not. It's surprising how much of the time that works, too. So like you, I find myself asking a question something like "How hard can this be, if there's a market?" After all, it's been done on lots of other platforms already. If it's not free, or even if it's not Free, I'm willing to buy it. I want the same quality and ease of Japanese input that users of other platforms enjoy, and it would be worth money to me. Even if such a system cost 20,000 - 30,000 yen a pop, I'd pay if it were that good. WNN6 costs about 9,000 yen, and it doesn't seem to be any better than Canna. Canna can at least make the defense that it doesn't cost anything, so my room for complaint is rather limited. WNN6 is not only proprietary, but quite expensive for what you get. If it's neither free nor Free, its room for excuse is rather limited, and my room for complaint is rather large. Cheers, Jonathan Byrne Media and Content Section 3Web - Your Internet Solution! <URL:http://www.threeweb.ad.jp/index.en.html> 3Web Channel <URL: http://www.3web.co.jp/> -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- Re: JB's NJWIN note (was: Re: tlug: Netscape and RH5.0)
- From: "Eric S. Standlee" <fwiw3980@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: JB's NJWIN note (was: Re: tlug: Netscape and RH5.0)
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: NCFTP and passive mode
- Prev by thread: Re: JB's NJWIN note (was: Re: tlug: Netscape and RH5.0)
- Next by thread: tlug: Easy-to-use =? good
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links