Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Karl-Max has cool dreams [was: dual-pentium processors]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Karl-Max has cool dreams [was: dual-pentium processors]
- From: Karl-Max Wagner <karlmax@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 12:10:30 +0000 (GMT)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <13783.36735.410832.446783@example.com> from "Stephen J. Turnbull" at Aug 17, 98 11:03:43 am
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
> But I don't think this is universally applicable. I never said it is that. But as you pointed out this kind of problem is extremely frequent. > Raaaaight. Not! I mean, I think that's inappropriate. What we know > neural networks (and similar) to be good at are excellent approximate > solutions to pattern recognition problems, "trainability," and the I didn't think so much of neural networks. Most paralell processing schemes are a lot more primitive than that. Take image processors as an example. It is easy to cut an image into small pieces to be processed sepately ( for the most part ). There are other problems of that kind, like weather forecasting, code cracking ( remember the RC5 cracking initiative ! ). In fact, that kind of things are what most computers are processing. > like. To apply parallel hardware discription languages to arbitrary > problems will require the willingness to accept approximate answers > from our machines. There ain't anything like and "exact" answer. Your answers are only as good as your input values. So in fact approximate answers are the order of the day. Anybody using circuit analyzer software knows that...... > Uh-uh. People are cheaper and more flexible. What we want from our Hmmm......actually people are pretty expensive..... > machines is better reliability than people can give you. We know very It's another question whether they give that to youm Machines are great in messing things up. No human being can make such a mess than a computer running Amok. > little about getting exact solutions to arbitrary problems based on > parallel computation. Actually - do we need them ? In practice approximate solutions are good enough. ================================================================ "It was hell. They knew it. Karl-Max Wagner But they called it karlmax@example.com W-I-N-D-O-Z-E" ================================================================ -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Karl-Max has cool dreams [was: dual-pentium processors]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: Karl-Max has cool dreams [was: dual-pentium processors]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Karl-Max has cool dreams [was: dual-pentium processors]
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Linux as Trade Mark?
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Karl-Max has cool dreams [was: dual-pentium processors]
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Karl-Max has cool dreams [was: dual-pentium processors]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links