Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: Re: Japanese input
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: Karl-Max Wagner <karlmax@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:20:10 +0000 (GMT)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980610173018.530A-100000@example.com> from "Gaspar Sinai" at Jun 10, 98 06:50:31 pm
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Hi Guys, watching all the discussion about Japanese input methods I am getting heretic ideas. Before setting them out some historic considerations, however. As far as I know, literacy in Japan started around 500 AD in Japan and the system used was the one the Chinese use ( I think this came about with Prince Shotoku's importation of pretty much anything the Chinese had at the time in an attempt to modernize Japan ). About 500 years later, around 1000 AD ( middle Heian ), a clever guy developed an alphabetic system, known hitherto as kana to replace the complicated Chinese system. This was subsequently taught to women ( they were considered too stupid for being taught Kanji at the time ) and the result was that some pieces of world literature were written - like Murasaki Shikibu's "Genji Monogatari". This proved that the new system was useable in practice. The logical consequence would have been to subsequently dump the kanji system and to use the kana thereafter. For reasons unknown to pretty much everybody, however, the kana system was used to glue the kanji together in the later course of history and women were taught kanji as well ( they finally found out that women were capable of understanding them ). When I consider the fact that kids need to be taught reading and writing more than eight years in japanese schools, the very considerable complexities in handling kanji using machines etc. etc. I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to do away with the kanji altogether and to stick to the tried and proven kana system. I am aware that there will be considerable political resistance against doing so and I might also have broken some cultural taboos in discussing the option. Well, I don't mind. I even don't know whether this has a chance of ever happening. However, this outdated kanji system is costing the japanese public a high price in terms of added complexity and extra time needed to handle it and this appears as a real waste to me - just consider the time programmers spend to design an implement input methods, the size of the font files etc. Karl-Max Wagner karlmax@example.com -------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages Next Nomikai: 17 July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 After June 13, the next meeting is 8 August at Tokyo Station -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: Matt Gushee <matt@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: Taro Yamamoto <tyamamot@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: Cliff Miller <cliff@example.com>
- tlug: Re: Japanese input
- From: Kei Furuuchi <kfur@example.com>
- References:
- Re: Japanese input (was RE: tlug: Japanese)
- From: Gaspar Sinai <gsinai@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: HELP!!!
- Next by Date: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- Prev by thread: Re: Japanese input (was RE: tlug: Japanese)
- Next by thread: tlug: Re: Japanese input
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links