Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: Broken postscript in Windows, fixable?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: Broken postscript in Windows, fixable?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:35:27 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.980423163454.24290a-100000@example.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.980423163454.24290a-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Stone <sstone@example.com> writes: Scott> My wife wanted me to print out her resume for her. prints Scott> out, but looks awful - fonts are so low-res that they're Scott> barely readable... is there any way to fix the fonts in a Scott> postscript file? Looking at the output from some .ps files Scott> generated by Linux netscape and emacs, I see embedded fonts Scott> in there, but not in the one generated by Windows... what Scott> can I do besides have her retype it on Applix here at work? Teach her LaTeX. :-P What do you mean by "embedded fonts"? Do you mean fonts invoked by name (as in `Helvetica 24 xchg findfont scalefont setfont') or actual encoded font data? If it's the former, it's easy enough to do, but whether it will be pretty or not.... If it's the latter, it may be possible but I've never tried anything like that. But I can't imagine why the latter could be low-res and ugly if the fonts are actually prepended to the file header. Are you using a real Postscript printer or Ghostscript? If it's the former, you can change the fonts in the .ps file to ones it knows about, but this is likely to be very ugly unless it has a _lot_ of fonts. AFAIK Word embeds lots of kerning (inter-character spacing) commands in the file, and those will be wrong unless the metrics of each character is the same. Ghostscript has lots of fonts, so you will probably be able to find one that works well enough. You can also look at ghostscript's stderr output to find out about font substitutions; most printers will not tell you about that. HTH --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 15 May Fri, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- References:
- tlug: Broken postscript in Windows, fixable?
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: tlug: Broken postscript in Windows, fixable?
- Next by Date: Re: FSF Emacs 20.x [was Re: tlug: Intimidation? [was: Office suite for use under Linux]
- Prev by thread: RE: tlug: Broken postscript in Windows, fixable?
- Next by thread: tlug: WindowMaker
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links