Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Re: tlug-digest V1 #781
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Re: tlug-digest V1 #781
- From: Karl-Max Wagner <karlmax@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 19:02:24 +0000 (GMT)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <34F1A1F6.32BDAF0D@example.com> from "Jonathan Byrne" at Feb 23, 98 04:21:10 pm
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
> I do have two machines hooked together with ethernet right > now. One is running Linux,and the other Windows 95-J (to be > NT Workstation-J whenever I can get around to installing > it). However, they are both also directly connected to the > Internet. For practising purposes it is better if both machines run Linux or BSD or another UNIX flavour. > What I need to do here is basically get the Linux box to act > as an SMTP server for the Windows box (and to send mail from > itself, as well, of course). What brings me to this is that > while my machines are plugged in, the only SMTP server I > have access to from here is the one at Geocities, where I > maintain my personal e-mail. Trouble is, they are going to > do what we and most other ISPs already do: shut off their > SMTP servers to outside access in a few weeks. For sending you don't need a server: if you use e.g. Netscape Mail you have the MTA already integrated. Your MTA in fact takes the mail from the spoolfile of your MUA, looks at one mail after the other, looks up the MX of the mail destination and transfers it directly there using an SMTP link. There is no need for an intermediary SMTP server or the like. The only time you need a server is for incoming mail if you have no permanent Internet connection, in order to fetch mail using POP. There most ISP allow only their clients to have an account on their MX. Some block even POP access from outside for security reasons. However, they cannot block SMTP to the outside world for incoming mail, because that would prevent mail delivery from the outside world altogether ! Some, however, block mail relaying, but this is of no consequence to you anyway. > > So where that leaves me (unless I can convince our network > operations people to set up some kind of work-around for me) Not necessary ( See above ). > So what I want the Linux machine to do is accept e-mail from Not necessary. Your WinBox can do that alone. The only thing you can do is using your Linuxbox as an MX. However, that requires an entry in the naed configfiles. A good book concerning that is "DNS and BIND", published by O'Reilly Associates and "Linux Network Administrator's Guide" by Olaf Kirch, also published by O'Reilly Associates. The latter is also available in electronic form at the Linux Documentation Project Sites. Once again: emailing on the sending side is COMPLETELY autonomous and does not require any help by a server. You just need an electronic P.O.Box for reception, which is called MX (mail exchanger). > If I put in Q-mail (is there an .rpm available?), what > happens to sendmail? Well, having both installed is probably not a good idea. However, the principle is the same. In fact, in your case sendmail is completely unnecessary. At a personal installation it is only required if you use a MUA without integrated MTA (e.g. elm), in this case sendmail is your MTA (this is what I do here). However, Netscape mail comes with an integrated MTA, so you don't need a separate MTA any more. So sendmail is not required. However, it is fun to play with. I have about 6 machines here and that allows interesting experiments. Actually, sendmail relies heavily on DNS. So, if you start studying sendmail, you better start studying BIND as well. Glossary: MUA : Mail User Agent: the thing you write and view your mails with. MTA : Mail Transfer Agent: the thing that takes the mails you wrote and gets them where you want them to be sent. MX : Mail Exchanger: your electronic P.O. Box, from which you fetch your incoming mail (normally using POP2 or POP3). BTW, here I use a Libretto 30 with PCMCIA Modem and Slackware 3.1, elm as a MUA and sendmail as a MTA. Mail fetching is done using popclient (POP3). Greetings from Munich Karl-Max Wagner karlmax@example.com --------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Nomikai: 11 March Wed 1998 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 19:30 Chuo-ku, Kyobashi 1-1-6, EchiZenYa Bld. B1/B2 03-3275-3691 Next TLUG Meeting: 11 April 1998 Saturday, Tokyo Station Featuring Tague Griffith of Netscape i18l talking on source code --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- References:
- tlug: Re: tlug-digest V1 #781
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jpmag@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: TLUG server as learning tool
- Next by Date: tlug: I am sorry things getting out of hand.
- Prev by thread: tlug: Re: tlug-digest V1 #781
- Next by thread: tlug: I am sorry things getting out of hand.
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links