Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re:Jim Breen's patched kterm
- To: Tokyo Linux Group <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re:Jim Breen's patched kterm
- From: Dennis McMurchy <denismcm@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:24:57 +0900 (GMT+0900)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
Hi again, Well, Steve was right. Including time.h and types.h (I don't care which did it) fixed that snag with the compile. A little later on though, this happens: gcc -c -O2 -m486 -ansi -I/usr/X11R6/include -Dlinux -D__i386__ -D_POSIX_SOUR CE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -DX_LOCALE -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO -DKTERM -DSTATUSLINE -DKEEPALIVE misc.c misc.c: In function `Bell': misc.c:328: too few arguments to function `gettimeofday' make: *** [misc.o] Error 1 The code at that point looks like this: gettimeofday(*curtime); now_msecs = 1000*curtime.tv_sec + curtime.tv_usec/1000; I don't have time to pursue this right now, but even I can see (I think) that we need another argument to the system call 'gettimeofday'. My question is, I guess, how on earth did Jim Breen ever get this to compile if it's such a mess? And is it worth my while fixing these problems one by one? Does anyone else out there think they need/want this? Want to help? Dennis McMurchy, Tojinmachi, Fukuoka ----------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor will appear below ----------------------------------------------------------------- The TLUG mailing list is proudly sponsored by TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System. Now offering 20,000 yen/year flat rate Internet access with no time charges. Full line of corporate Internet and intranet products are available. info@example.com Tel: 03-3351-5977 Fax: 03-3353-6096
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re:Jim Breen's patched kterm
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: kterm 6.20?
- Next by Date: Re: trans and trans.el (mule and edict)
- Prev by thread: RE: Jim Breen's patched kterm
- Next by thread: Re: Re:Jim Breen's patched kterm
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links