Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: I'd like to know what hardware is the best for Linux and Windows 95
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: I'd like to know what hardware is the best for Linux and Windows 95
- From: Norihide Kise <s100234@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 1996 05:59:00 -0600 (CST)
- Cc: tlug@example.com
- Content-Length: 3023
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <lvl5wUr0B06R089yn@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Hello, guys. I still have some questions. If you could give me your informative comments, I'd appreciate. > Norihide Kise <s100234@example.com> wrote: > > > >I was goning to buy a new computer through a mail order company like > >Gateway 2000, or Dell, but when I saw their price tags, I changed my > >mind. *Motherboard - (Intel?) If anyone could explain about differences among the motherbord, I'd like to hear that explanations. For instance, Intel makes "Zappa Motherboards," "Endervor Motherboards," etc.. Also, what's meaning of "Tritron Chipsets?" *BIOS - (Should I get flash BIOS? Which maker is the best?) *controller - (PCI EIDE controller? Which manufactuer is the best? *Sound Board - (cheap SoundBlaster 16-bit ok?) > > *Video card - ? > > *Video memory - 1MB (at least, right?) > I'd suggest at least 2MB. I like the ATI Mach 64 card I have in one of > the machines in the office. The ET4000/W32p board I have in my home > machine is a good low price alternative, since it has good "DOS performance" > (i.e. writing directly into the frame buffer is fast, but the accelleration > features are nothing special). Is having 2MB necessary? I am not a graphics designer. Also, there are some significant price differences among ATI Mach 64 cards because of VRAM-based cards and DRAM-based card. Are DRAM-based cards good enough? I'd like somebody to recommends some alternative boards. > > *CD-ROM drive - double speed (which manufacture?) > You might consider 4X. Now that the 6X and 8X drives are shipping in > volume, 4X drives have dropped significantly in price. (Of course, > it also means that 2X drives are really cheap now.) Do you think that it is necessary to have a 2X CD-ROM drive? I'm a student studying Computer Science. I mainly use my computer to program in C, C++, and assembly, and do some database stuff. Plus, using my home PC, I log on to the unix system at the university. About Linux, I just play with it. I've never programmed under Linux. The reason why I play with it is if somebody ask about Linux, I just cannot say, "What's that? I don't know anything about it!" Anyway, if I need a 2X CD-ROM drive, please explain why. It helps me to understand the unknown territory Linux! > > *Monitor - NEC XV 14" > I've been spoiled. I think 15" is the minimum you should consider, > with 17" being so much nicer that it is tough to recommend anything > smaller. If you are going to be using a GUI, you need the extra > screen real estate. I think the monitor is the most dangerous place > to compromise. Well, Jim. I basically agree with you, but getting the NEC XV 15" monitor costs me $419 + $24.50 for shipping. On the other hand, the NEC XV 14" monitor costs me $289 + $24.50 for shipping. Also, the XV 14" monitor has the 13" viewing area and the XV 15" monitor has the 13.8" viewing area. Although it's small, I think that the NEC XV 14" monitor is good to buy, but I'd like to hear from anyone who disagree with me. Sincerely,
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I'd like to know what hardware is the best for Linux and Windows 95
- From: jwt@example.com (Jim Tittsler)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Red Hat Commercial Linux
- Next by Date: Re: I'd like to know what hardware is the best for Linux and Windows 95
- Prev by thread: Re: Red Hat Commercial Linux
- Next by thread: Re: I'd like to know what hardware is the best for Linux and Windows 95
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links