Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Corona and schools in Japan
- Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 15:57:20 +0900
- From: "Curt J. Sampson" <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Corona and schools in Japan
- References: <20200428094558.GA27898@fluxcoil.net> <24233.25074.83258.235272@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <2b45b3c7-40e4-8b3d-7bcc-ed468b4f4f77@drake.edu> <24234.26469.763544.621109@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <2139e65a-052d-4083-7dd1-6750078444c7@drake.edu> <1201e4f5-4749-2ba5-e866-07a4fa8c3955@dcook.org> <20200430154029.r263jvvbfxazpm5y@scott2.scottro.net>
- User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
On 2020-04-30 11:40 -0400 (Thu), Scott Robbins wrote: > For me it's Slack. When they started, it was easy to use irssi and weechat > with them. Then they took the irc gateway off.... > > Anyway, point being that Slack started being able to work with everything > and is gradually pushing them all out--seems like they're using the old > embrace, engulf, and extinguish (or whatever it is). Well, that seems to me a natural effect of Slack being what it is. In terms of features and usability, Slack is one of the best chat systems out there. (With the odd exception: why they insist that link text must be the raw URL, even if it's a 250 character unreadable monstrosity, is beyond me.) In other chat systems I really miss threads and embedded shared editable documents, for example. But as such features get added, gatewaying becomes harder. (A good bit of the difficulty is probably invisible unless you're familiar with the corporate Slack features, such how it deals with auditing, federation and guest accounts, and so on.) Also, keep in mind Slack's target audience: relatively small, closed groups. In most cases the organization is not just paying Slack for the service, but paying _you_ to be using that service, and not infrequently has even has provided you with the system running the chat client. They're generally not interested in supporting other clients because there's really no gain there. (I am here talking not about idiot organziations who don't understand productivity and would make a vim user use Emacs or vice versa, but organizations that are effective at making their workers productive by letting them use good tools.) So as commercial services go, Slack looks to me to be one of the most innocuous. Their model is clearly to make money by directly charging the organizations that want the service, and they have no interest in anybody who's not willing to pay for that. They're nothing at all like the truly insidious examples of exploitative services, such as Line. cjs -- Curt J. Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 To iterate is human, to recurse divine. - L Peter Deutsch
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Corona and schools in Japan
- From: Scott Robbins
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Corona and schools in Japan
- From: Scott Robbins
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] GW projects
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Corona and schools in Japan
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Corona and schools in Japan
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Corona and schools in Japan
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links