Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:09:31 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On 2017-06-23 10:58 +0900 (Fri), kts wrote: > My question is still the same… how much cpu/speed/mem is enough for > a basic file and web server, lightly used, that is good for 24/7 use > and cheap on …uhm… everything? You don't need much CPU and memory from the sound of it, especially if you avoid running a graphical console. I'd consider a used high-quality "desktop replacement" laptop, such as the ThinkPad T400 or T500 series. The fairly old T510, at least, has GigE, so my guess is that they all do. (Older versions of these can be found for 2-4 man yen; I have bought close to a dozen from be-stock.com and have been quite pleased. Just make sure you read the descriptions carefully so you know what, if anything, is broken on them.) Typically you'll want to replace the internal 2.5" HDD with an SSD, which adds another $100 or so to the cost, and you may need to upgrade the memory as well; a 2 GB model should almost certainly be upgraded to 4 GB and you may want to bump even a 4 GB model up to 8 GB. The issue then just becomes getting enough drive space connected to the host with a reasonably fast connection. (You probably don't want to be using USB 2.0, though it may be livable if your LAN is only WiFi or 100 Mbps Ethernet.) I can think of a few options: 1. External RAID controller and case with an E-SATA interface that makes all your external storage appear as one SATA drive, plugged into the one E-SATA interface on the laptop. 2. External drive case/controller with a USB 3.0 interface (or multiple USB 3.0 cases/controllers and a USB 3.0 hub), plugged into a PC Card USB 3.0 controller in the PC card slot. 3. Some sort of Network Block Device[1] technology hooked up to the one Ethernet port. This has the issue that you need to share your file-serving bandwidth and disk bandwidth, and I wouldn't feel too comfortable having the disks on the main LAN either, which would mean you'd want to invest another $50 in a VLAN-capable switch as well, so this idea doesn't really sound worth pursuing to me. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_block_device cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 To iterate is human, to recurse divine. - L Peter Deutsch
- References:
- [tlug] silicon cash eater
- From: kts
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] silicon cash eater
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links