Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:48:07 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- References: <AANLkTinqWALO-HegfvFhmdgP+u-1rxMoe3cO_pMqjHrZ@example.com> <AANLkTimEoRGwAsd0QwbcJbuiA0STRBu0p4HzX9mKf_QF@example.com> <AANLkTi=C1PoeD7vx2tEGZEVutBSOnwzV9ZtpYV8TvO37@example.com> <AANLkTi=ba=hV8PanO-jy1jMATrEv8EQWrrZMTse00eLZ@example.com> <87mxr5215n.fsf@example.com> <1285443425.12203.1396866107@example.com>
David J Iannucci writes: > Perhaps so historically, but I can't recommend KDE for this > application.... OK, well, I have to concede that since I don't use it for much any more. > 3.x has been abandoned by upstream, so you won't find it in a more > up-to-date distro (which I'd think you'd wanna run for security > reasons if nothing else), On a netbook? As long you don't allow incoming connections, even today you're reasonably safe, I should think, even if you do have a recent but unpatched Linux kernel. But then, I do all my sensitive work on boxes that don't have network connections at all, so I don't worry terribly much about my net-facing boxes.
- References:
- [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- From: Jean-Christian Imbeault
- Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- From: Niels Kobschaetzki
- Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- From: Shawn Brown
- Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- From: Jean-Christian Imbeault
- Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- From: David J Iannucci
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] GPL non-sense
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Ubuntu on just 256 MB?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links