Re: [tlug] recomendations for a functional language

[Attila Kinali <attila@example.com>]

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:28:21 +0900
Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote:

> If you really want to see as much new stuff as possible, Haskell is
> probably the only real option. After you've played with that a bit and
> evaluated all of the various features it has, you can decide which ones
> you can live without and move on to another language from there, taking
> all of your general knowledge with you.

You graded Common Lisp, Scheme and Haskell, without giving much
information how you compared them. May i ask what you think the
major differences of these languages are?

				Attila Kinali
-- 
The trouble with you, Shev, is you don't say anything until you've saved
up a whole truckload of damned heavy brick arguments and then you dump
them all out and never look at the bleeding body mangled beneath the heap
		-- Tirin, The Dispossessed, U. Le Guin