Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:42:43 +0900
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- References: <5634e9210903161814j5d12c632pf3a74a8cf8e13449@mail.gmail.com> <68F29586-46EA-4929-ACFD-C2874088408B@gmail.com> <5634e9210903161930w1c5c6f78g81e12a070741d7@mail.gmail.com> <d8fcc0800903170048y23948dd4t839fbfcf2abcd249@mail.gmail.com> <87d4cg7bh6.fsf@xemacs.org>
2009/3/17 Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com>: > Gen's point is precisely that although the bug is a regression (== > "somebody broke whut didn't need no fixin' nohow"), there is now no > regression test, and no code will be allowed in until there is one. Oh yes, I agree completely with that approach. When I report a bug at work, I attach a unit test that exposes the bug so that when a developer (often me) starts to work on the fix, the TDD approach is guaranteed. > See http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html for the more realistic assessment > of just how cold it will be in hell when that happens. Yeah. If anyone is interested in working on an Open Source project with a development methodology that does not suck, I have a few projects going, and I hear Starling is hiring. :) -- Cheers, Josh
- References:
- [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Gen Kanai
- Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Flash and Firexfox 2
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links