Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Long-term Stability Distros (was: Flash and Firexfox 2)
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:36:42 +0000
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Long-term Stability Distros (was: Flash and Firexfox 2)
- References: <5634e9210903112233k1a4ac6a8x27586da1cedc8853@mail.gmail.com> <1236842377.18591.1304983173@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5634e9210903121722h2a99e25cq7e79853af991258b@mail.gmail.com> <200903130911.27774.daniel.ramaley@drake.edu>
2009/3/13 Daniel A. Ramaley <daniel.ramaley@example.com>: > I changed to Debian for exactly the same reasons you are describing. > Well, that and dependency Hell. I've heard that dependency Hell doesn't > happen anymore on Red Hat based distros, As long as there are dependencies, there will be Dependency Hell. The real question is, does your distro give you tools for dealing with it? I find Debian / Ubuntu just as frustrating as Red Hat (and other RPM-based distros). Gentoo and other source-based distros do a better job, simply because they give you compile-time control over what dependencies you choose to accept, as long as the source builds themselves have reasonable configuration scripts. The best way to handle this is: 1. For your desktop environment, use the native package system 2. For any service you are developing, use a deployment manager like QAM to handle all the dependencies This stuff ain't easy, and there's a reason that Steve and I feel that a book needs to be written on how to deal with dependencies (though we would be focusing on the development side). -- Cheers, Josh
- References:
- [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: David J Iannucci
- Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Long-term Stability Distros (was: Flash and Firexfox 2)
- From: Daniel A. Ramaley
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Long-term Stability Distros (was: Flash and Firexfox 2)
- Next by Date: Re: Long-term Stability Distros: RHEL/Centos 5 versus 6 (was Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Long-term Stability Distros (was: Flash and Firexfox 2)
- Next by thread: [tlug] VirtualBox: One Last Question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links