Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:03:47 +0900
- From: Edward Middleton <emiddleton@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- References: <5634e9210810070318s1c33aeaap3f9069d95634afb7@mail.gmail.com> <ed10ee420810080046n530ea969uaecb6ffd842bf6dd@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080929)
SL Baur wrote: > On 10/7/08, Jim Breen <jimbreen@example.com> wrote: > >> In our usual single-member electorates if the final result is very close, >> the paper ballots are recounted several times and every disputed paper >> argued over. Usually it ends up in court, and the judge can order a new >> election for the district if no clear result is possible. >> > > Sounds sensible. > > Just what "problem" are you e-voting guys trying to solve, again? > They are trying to avoid it ending up in the courts. It should be obvious that this is not a satisfactory outcome. The guiding principles behind election held in Australia are[1][2] * transparency * security * professionalism * accuracy * secrecy * timeliness * accountability * equity I presume the US process is guided by similar principles? > Non-USians usually have no idea how much us USians like closure > on things like this. We have not had a decisive President since > President Reagan. Doubt in the way ballots are being (mis)counted > is really the last thing we need right now. > The 2000 presidential election residual votes[3][4][5] (invalid votes) were significant enough to have effect the outcome of the election. i.e. the error in the election process (not the counting process) was sufficient to effect the outcome of the election. In Australia we have compulsory voting so it is arguable that some voters intentionally made invalid votes. In the US voting is voluntary so the likelihood of this is very low, i.e. a significant number of voters preferences were not recorded by the current process and that may have effected the outcome of the election. That is a failure of the election process. Edward 1. http://aceproject.org/ero-en/regions/pacific/AU/PolFut.pdf 2. http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/ti224.pdf 3. www.*vote*.caltech.edu/media/documents/vtp_wp21v2.3.pdf 4. http://www.umsl.edu/~kimballd/rtables.pdf 5. http://www.capc.umd.edu/rpts/Impact_of_*Voting*_Systems.pdf
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Okay... wow. Ubuntu just impressed me greatly.
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Somewhat OT- open source software for US voting machines
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links