Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:48:09 +0900
- From: "Hung Nguyen Vu" <vuhung16plus+shape@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- References: <48AA5EEF.8000904@bebear.net> <20080819082133.GA5229@lucky.cynic.net>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote:Unfortunately, this is no way qualifies as a "large system" in the sense
I agree. 100KLOC and 20 man-year is an average-sized project,
not a big project.Along that line of thought, I'd estimate that Haskell runs about
5-20% the linecount of Java for equivalant functionality.I will not look at LOC to judge a language is better than the others.
C is verbose while it runs a little faster if well crafted.
I have no idea about Haskell but if you mean by generic programming,
Haskell saves 5-20% LOC then I have to agree. Such code will be compact
but harder to maintain.
Agg is an example of using C++ template: compact, short, fast and
almost no comment in the code. It saves about 40% LOC in comparison to cairo
when doing the same task.
--
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vuhung16plus{remove}@example.com , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg
Japan through an eye of a gaijin:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- [tlug] Large project Agile development
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Large project Agile development
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links