Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:14:17 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- References: <20080727120405.752622d9.attila@kinali.ch> <20080727223043.GK4228@pragmatic.cynic.net> <d8fcc0800807280002v3f14071dk3b2c9e47ac3269c8@mail.gmail.com> <20080728080316.GA16586@lucky.cynic.net> <d8fcc0800807280309j3d410857w9b9e5fdd3462316a@mail.gmail.com> <87tze9cdxk.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080729092619.GI16234@lucky.cynic.net> <87ljzkcxx7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080730005104.GG5154@lucky.cynic.net> <87abg0c4jg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On 2008-07-30 14:41 +0900 (Wed), Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Proof? Motorola was in the market just as early with the > 6502.... Errr...maybe you want to go back and review the history and then decide if this is proof. Motorola's chip was the 6800, selling (like the other guys) at about $175 a pop when MOS Technology came out with the 6502 selling at $25 per unit. There's a very interesting story behind that, but it doesn't come out proving that Motorola was ever really far ahead of everyone else in the CPU business, albeit they made chips with pretty nice architectures. > ...and then had a much better chip in the 68000. Much better than what? The competition? If so, what made it (what the heck, the entire series) so much better than the National Semiconductor 16032, 32032, etc.? cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Attila Kinali
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links