Re: [tlug] STM (was: Re: work times & accommodation @tokyo)

["Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>]

2008/7/28 Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>:

> But let's try this on for size: what is it about Haskell's STM interface
> definition that might make it not work where "traditional" composition
> of locks, as in most threaded Java applications I've seen, would work?

The point is this: I read Attila's question as, "Has anyone on the
list direct experience with using STM? Does it work as advertised?"
Your answer sounds like, "No, but it should work."

Which is a fine answer--given your background and experience--but to a
different question. :)

-- 
Cheers,
Josh