Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:22:32 +0900
- From: "Bruno Raoult" <braoult@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- References: <c0f4e2b00806140549r1b18f3c1mc38c83fe02614d17@mail.gmail.com> <c0f4e2b00806190534u52dd12c6rcab68255ca62e408@mail.gmail.com> <20080619230357.GA19792@lucky.cynic.net>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote:br.Oh, one more option, taking even less time, is to get a new router
and move the storage device onto one of the LAN ports on that router,
eliminating the need for routing or bridging on the Linux box.
Yes, I thought also about this one, but I was afraid of routing issues.
The problem is that I wand to keep the Gb ethernet between my storage and
the linux box.
This means the new wifi router will also be on that network, as the storage
as only 1 interface.
This means then that this Gb network will be the same network as the wifi
network, where the Linux box is already connected.
I had bad feeling, and stopped my thinking at that level :-)
--
2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Bruno Raoult
- Re: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Bruno Raoult
- [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Bruno Raoult
- Re: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] First FF3.0 bug? F6 doesn't work
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] using rusage
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links