Re: [tlug] Abiword and Japanese

["Niels Kobschaetzki" <n.kobschaetzki@example.com>]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Niels Kobschaetzki
<n.kobschaetzki@example.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> wrote:
>  > On 26/03/2008, emiddleton@example.com
>  >
>  > <emiddleton@example.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >  > Josh Glover wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  >  > On 26/03/2008, Niels Kobschaetzki <n.kobschaetzki@example.com> wrote:
>  >  >  >>  TextMate is *the* text-editor in my opinion (tried a lot, none compares
>  >  >  >>  -- hmm…how long will it take 'til an emacs-guy responds to that…),
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > Not long:
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > *plonk*
>  >  >
>  >  > Have you used TextMate?  As a die hard XEmacs connoisseur, are there
>  >  >  things TextMate has done wrong?
>  >
>  >  You've answered your first question with the wording of your second,
>  >  and the answer to the second is clearly: "TextMate has not had TLUG
>  >  members working as Release Managers". ;)
>
>  And besides that: it does several things wrong which are regularly
>  criticized and the vaporware TM 2.0 shall improve all of it ;)
>  But besides that: It's easily extendible, very powerful and it's
>  possible to use it w/out having done a course of introduction (for
>  getting the whole power out of it you should have read the manual, the
>  book and seen the screencasts (great way for introducing stuff
>  actually).
>  Btw. did emacs ever had an usability-evaluation (TM did neither but well…)? ;)

In addition I have to say that I always wanted to learn emacs to get
to know what so many ppl like about it (starting the install right
now…once again) but never came very far -- it seems that it is quite a
good latex-editor.

Niels