Re: [tlug] Bashing away at Unix

["SL Baur" <steve@example.com>]

On 3/14/08, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote:

> What's worse, if Vu Hung did the experiment correctly, bash v3.2
>  doesn't conform to its own documentation (I checked, first).  Or
>  possibly it wants argv[0] to be exactly "sh".

That would always be "/bin/sh" or "-bin/sh".

Bah!  XEmacs does more checking than that to take care when it is
invoked as a login shell!  I know.  I put some of the checks in there
myself.

-sb