Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:20:36 +0900
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung <vu-hung@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- References: <46E8EE01.4040404@cnt.mxt.nes.nec.co.jp> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0709141931330.4169@homeric.cynic.net> <46F9BA8B.3010507@simon-cozens.org>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
Simon Cozens さんは書きました: > Curt Sampson wrote: >> Well, that in part depends on whether you're likely to have to debug >> installations that are out in the field. > > You are; life is hard. IMO We need them in place if they do not stress the servers. > >> But generally, I delete the debug code completely, becuase it's only >> there to get me to the point where I have an automated test passing, and >> if it ever breaks again, the test is designed to tell me what's wrong. > > That's not deleting your debug code, that's moving it to another file. :) > Anyone tried Perl's Smart::Comments. FYI, Smart::Comments[1] are just comments, but they can be trigged with a flag , acted as a "debugger" when needed. BR, NVH [1] http://search.cpan.org/~dconway/Smart-Comments-v1.0.2/lib/Smart/Comments.pm
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- From: Kim Ahlström
- References:
- [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung ①
- Re: [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- From: Simon Cozens
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] [Postfix] Virtual User and .forward file
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] [Postfix] [Solution]Virtual User and .forward file
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Policy on debug codes
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links