On 28/07/07, Keith Bawden <keith@example.com> wrote:
Can we not publish the paper with a notification that this is the work
of "A" member of TLUG and does not necessarily reflect a single belief
of any other member/s?
Precisely. See #9 here:
http://www.tlug.jp/wiki/Articles:Policies:Process
My preference is to encourage people. After a review to ensure the
content is related in some way with the theme of our LUG then we throw
it online and post the above mentioned notification. Note: it only has
to be topical to our group, and not necessarily towing our "corporate
line".
+1
I would even support someone posting a pro Microsoft article against
open source. I may not agree with the content but I would not mind
having those opinions posted along side the more common ones likely to
be found in our group. Of course the notification would be all
important in this more extreme example.
To paraphrase Voltaire, "I may find your idea completely repulsive,
but I will defend to the death your right to state it."
The point of grammar, style, brevity, and so on is something I will
happily ignore, as will many other readers within the first paragraph
or two. In the end, and as others have pointed out, if the author
wants to be read and taken seriously they will attempt to write
accordingly... this is the authors choice not ours.
+1
So to sum up here is what I propose:
Anything can be published by a member to the site with the following conditions:
1. Standard notice/disclaimer is included denouncing group ownership
of the content.
2. Content is reviewed to ensure it is topical and contains nothing
illegal/hateful...
I think I codified this attitude perfectly:
http://www.tlug.jp/wiki/Articles:Policies:Process