Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 16:34:05 +0900
- From: "Jedidiah Israel" <jedidiah.israel@example.com>
- Subject: Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- References: <eee698730705081314x202eea43k3d8d8abb3c02dc7e@mail.gmail.com> <749664.93739.qm@web25415.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <eee698730705081711q2d2e02ccq6fcf78544d92b253@mail.gmail.com> <20070509014620.GB58681@samsara.bebear.net>
On 5/9/07, Al Hoang <hoanga@example.com> wrote:
Depending on your needs, you might want to also explore OpenVZ [1] if you don't need a whole instance that is virtualized. It is conceptually similar to what FreeBSD calls Jails or Solaris calls zones/containers.
Thank you. I was not aware of OpenVZ.
1. Each virtualized instance needs basically a whole install to run properly which dictates they also need space. So let's say you want to run 10 service instances and you have pared down your custom Linux install to about 20MB. Each virtualized instance will require approximately the same amount plus factor in the compiled binaries for the service in question.
Using aufs I hope to pare down to an even smaller size, just kernel, modules and app if possible. Data files, including read-only app configuration files, would be located outside the instance.
2. How will you handle updating the services in each virtualized instance to deal with security instances
I have not given it much thought. I suppose just patching the kernel, modules or app then overwrite the previous instance with a newer one.
3. Is KVM or whatever you choose robust enough to do what you envision or will it require upgrades. If so then how does this get upgraded?
I do not know yet.
Anyways good luck, I'd be curious to see the results although am confused with the vision still.
For vision, well, to come up with an easier way to administer policy enforcement. I can not wrap my mind around LinuxSE. I would like to have specific roles for each instance. I like the idea of the instances being exported to other servers but maintain filesystem and security integrity. Logs would be maintained in a centralized repository. The dream includes having an all Linux solution under GPL. This is the short list.
And I am shooting for something that is eventually Mac simple. As in drag it over to my Application folder and configure. ;)
I`ll look into your`s and Mattia`s suggestions as well. This summer should be alot of fun. It should be a good project for learning Linux in more detail.
Cheers, Jed
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Curt Sampson
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Jedidiah Israel
- RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: leon calvaud
- Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Jedidiah Israel
- Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Al Hoang
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Alternatives to MS-Powerpoint?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Alternatives to MS-Powerpoint?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- Next by thread: Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links