Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 13:43:19 +0900
- From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- References: <eee698730705081314x202eea43k3d8d8abb3c02dc7e@mail.gmail.com> <749664.93739.qm@web25415.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <eee698730705081711q2d2e02ccq6fcf78544d92b253@mail.gmail.com> <20070509014620.GB58681@samsara.bebear.net>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:46:20AM +0900, Al Hoang wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:11:17AM +0900, Jedidiah Israel wrote: > > On 5/9/07, leon calvaud <enae95@example.com> wrote: > > > > It does. Thank you. > > > > My lofty idea is to create a Linux project that uses KVM to host > > individual service instances. For example, having a mail instance, a > > http server instance, and so forth. I hope to use FUSE to bound the > > file systems where appropriate. The idea needs alot of work. It is > > similar to jailed environment, but I want something more than a simple > > jail. > > > > The initial goals are to 1) replace VMware, 2) steer clear of SELinux > > and 3) stay small and conceptually simple. > > Depending on your needs, you might want to also explore OpenVZ [1] if you > don't need a whole instance that is virtualized. It is conceptually similar to what > FreeBSD calls Jails or Solaris calls zones/containers. > > Also I'm a little confused if your host environment is going to be on this > highly constrained environment or are the virtualized instances going to be going > on a diet. If it is the former, I'm curious to see if this will work well in practice > since the following things sort of spring to mind: > > 1. Each virtualized instance needs basically a whole install to run > properly which dictates they also need space. So let's say you > want to run 10 service instances and you have pared down your > custom Linux install to about 20MB. Each virtualized instance > will require approximately the same amount plus factor in the compiled > binaries for the service in question. then user-mode-linux might be a nice choice. See the COW file format, basically you can have just one base install shared between all the UML instances and have COW files for each of the "service-instances". http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/shared_fs.html I guess qemu can do something similar but I'm having no luck with google now. Cheers -- mattia :wq!
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Jedidiah Israel
- RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: leon calvaud
- Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Jedidiah Israel
- Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- From: Al Hoang
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] NVIDIA Job opportunities
- Next by Date: [tlug] domain name registrar
- Previous by thread: Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- Next by thread: Re: RE : Re: [tlug] Small footprint Linux distribution without a GUI
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links