Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 16:49:47 +0900 (JST)
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- References: <9342fdf30612082004y2b0cab57h57a3e0f32f720f77@example.com> <20061209052445.GD9438@example.com> <457A8FEB.7060207@example.com>
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Peter Van der Weeen wrote:
Interestingly, so far no one has brought up the issue of SAS/SCSI versus SATA. I guess that means it is safe to assume any difference in performance/stability between the two should not be considered an issue anymore?
One disk per IDE (or SATA, or whatever) channel is the best way to go. Two I've found doesnt' hurt much, oddly enough, at least with applications with any sort of random seek component.
Sad to say, copper SCSI doesn't really offer much advantage these days.
cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- References:
- [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- From: Peter Van der Weeen
- Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- From: Al Hoang
- Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- From: Peter Van der Weeen
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Re: routers and port forwarding
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Writing on a CD
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links