Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 14:24:45 +0900
- From: Al Hoang <hoanga@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- References: <9342fdf30612082004y2b0cab57h57a3e0f32f720f77@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
Hi Peter, On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 01:04:34PM +0900, Peter Van der Weeen wrote: > [snip] > Options are: > (1) 2 x SATA II 250GB disks with software RAID-1 > (2) SAS5iR controller + 2 x 300GB SAS (10k) disks and hardware RAID-1 > > Option (2) costs about 100.000 yen more than (1) [snip] > We don't need to go for the latest and the greatest, I simply want something > that gives us as much performance as possible at a reasonable cost. > If you're not looking for the latest and greatest then in terms of performance you don't sound like you're hurting too much or perhaps you are? While disk access definitely does matter in a web/db server setup one question I'm not sure on is whether you're running into performance issues with your current setup. And how much different the new hardware setup will be from your current setup. If you have done benchmarking and profiling of your setup (long, tedious and ultimately the final answer on most things performance) and find you need all the disk speed acess you can get then it makes sense to plop down more money on a real hardware RAID controller as this an offload system load to the RAID controller and perhaps get a decent benefit. But it seems from a quick read that this also matters on how well the RAID controller drivers will work with Linux. This is something that might need some research as a poorly supported hardware RAID controller under Linux will be a big disappointment. So you might want to look at this checklist and prioritize to help you identify whether options (1) or (2) are better: *. Price *. Disk access read speed (RAID-1 tends to be better) *. Disk access write speed (RAID-1 should not be faster than only one disk) *. CPU load *. Ease of maintenance (Which one do you know better?) *. Driver support (Do you want to spend the next weekend trying to patch the next kernel revision in order to get your RAID controller working?) *. Price (People keep bringing this up all the time :-) so I add it in again) Here's some more references to help you make a decision... The Waikato LUG has setup a very nice wiki collecting people's experiences on software and hardware RAID: http://www.wlug.org.nz/SoftwareRaidVsHardwareRaid A quick thread on the SAS5iR controller card (Seems to indicate this driver requires a binary driver) http://www.archivesat.com/Linux_on_Dell_PowerEdge_Servers/thread2194835.htm Someone else went through the long and tedious process of benchmarking Hardware RAID and software RAID (Note this is an old setup) http://www.chemistry.wustl.edu/~gelb/castle_raid.html Alain
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- From: Peter Van der Weeen
- References:
- [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- From: Peter Van der Weeen
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] customizing firefox?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] routers and port forwarding
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] SATA software RAID or SAS hardware RAID?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links