Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Email address munging in the TLUG archives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (was Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam)
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:07:33 -0500
- From: Jim <jep200404@example.com>
- Subject: Email address munging in the TLUG archives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (was Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam)
- References: <E1Grn0t-00029q-UE@example.com> <002901c71939$c72bb870$0301a8c0@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0612070809390.3467@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0612070859230.3467@example.com> <d8fcc0800612061628l2d138931y845e18fbff4ed38@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0612071044290.10468@example.com>
Curt Sampson wrote: > So why would we bother to obfuscate addresses? To frustrate the spammers while letting legitimate folks get in touch with each other. It's a compromise.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [tlug] Eliminating spam using email with an economic model
- From: Shannon Jacobs \(6881\)
- [tlug] Re: several messages
- From: Curt Sampson
- [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- Next by Date: Re: Email address munging in the TLUG archives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (was Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- Next by thread: Re: Email address munging in the TLUG archives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (was Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links