Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][tlug] Re: several messages
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 08:21:17 +0900 (JST)
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] Re: several messages
- References: <E1Grn0t-00029q-UE@example.com> <002901c71939$c72bb870$0301a8c0@example.com>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Godwin Stewart wrote:
Why should they go to the trouble of deobfuscating e-mail addresses when it's so easy to have software generate them randomly and then sell them?
Becuase it's also pretty easy to de-obfuscate them.
Given a system that is already scraping non-obfuscated addresses from web pages, how long would it take an average programmer to extend it to deal with the common forms of text obfuscation? A day or two? The low end of the going rate for programmers from India and Eastern Europe is $5 an hour, so that's $40-$80. That's almost certainly cheaper than writing new software to do the random address to SMTP thing, and you also don't have to deal with the hassles of active attacks, where you've got an annoyed sysadmin on the other end who is (due to the amount of his system resources you're using up) a rather strong interesting in stopping your SMTP program.
Keeping up with every small advance in obfuscation is fairly cheap for any individual step.
Shannon Jacobs wrote:
> I think spammers make decent money without having to work > particularly hard.
Not from what I've seen. I've been watching spammers pretty carefully for a decade or so now (I started an ISP in 1995), I know how to do it if I wanted to, and I can certainly think of easier ways to make a buck.
> Everything is automated, so all they have to do is buy their > lists of email addresses, feed them to the software, and go.
It's far from that easy. I won't get into all of the tedious details.
However, in my case I admit that I want my NEMS address blocked in Case 4. I just want *ONE* email address that will never get spam, no matter how many people know it.
And you're happy that you can't just hand a business card to someone to give them the ability to send you e-mail.
That doesn't work for me, and there's a lot of other people in the same boat. The spam problem would have to be much, much worse before I'd switch away from standard SMTP.
cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974
- Follow-Ups:
- [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Re: several messages
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- [tlug] Eliminating spam using email with an economic model
- From: Shannon Jacobs \(6881\)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Planet TLUG?
- Next by Date: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Eliminating spam using email with an economic model
- Next by thread: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links