Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:45:31 +0900 (JST)
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- References: <E1Grn0t-00029q-UE@example.com> <002901c71939$c72bb870$0301a8c0@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0612070809390.3467@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0612070859230.3467@example.com> <d8fcc0800612061628l2d138931y845e18fbff4ed38@example.com>
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Josh Glover wrote:
On 07/12/06, Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote:
[I]f they're not scraping all of the obfuscated addresses out there, it's because they don't need to.
Isn't this precisely what Godwin was saying?
Could well be, in which case we'd be in violent agreement.
So why would we bother to obfuscate addresses?
cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [tlug] Eliminating spam using email with an economic model
- From: Shannon Jacobs \(6881\)
- [tlug] Re: several messages
- From: Curt Sampson
- [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] [SEMI OT (or is that fairly OT)] Work relate questions
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Email address munging in the TLUG archives
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] NYT Article on Spam
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links