Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 00:30:03 +0900 (JST)
- From: Tod McQuillin <devin@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- References: <ea4e853e0605200054p4b91aa01x822fdff42b057ec8@example.com> <20060520100747.86ac44d1.godwin.stewart@example.com> <20060520101249.e17f88a9.godwin.stewart@example.com> <446EE621.8030607@example.com> <20060520093710.69aef0c5.jep200404@example.com> <20060520155749.f266b5bb.godwin.stewart@example.com>
On Sat, 20 May 2006, Godwin Stewart wrote:Lossless compression does not have that quality degradation concern.But does it really exist? Is FLAC, for example, *really* lossless in absolute terms or are the losses outside the human audible range (much like they are in OGG)? IOW, if you compress an uncompressed stream such as PCM WAV and then re-uncompress the compressed stream, do you get back exactly the same data as you started with?Yes, FLAC is really lossless. When you uncompress a flac file you get back exactly the same bits that were originaly compressed.-- Tod
- References:
- [tlug] OGG & MP3
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- From: Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon
- [tlug] CD Ripping and Compression Quality (was OGG & MP3)
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- From: Godwin Stewart
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Lossless Audio Compression
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] OGG & MP3
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] CD Ripping and Compression Quality (was OGG & MP3)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links