Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:45:15 +0900
- From: "Michael(tm) Smith" <smith@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- References: <20060427224302.1dbacd7c.jep200404@example.com> <20060428044448.1277.qmail@example.com> <d8fcc0800604280019l26fa3f96h3d1410231485afe6@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> writes: > On 28/04/06, Gerald Naughton <naughton123@example.com> wrote: > > > Wow Jim , you`re going into detail on syntax > > Internal s/w means that we`ve access to it > > (even some source code ) > > The reason that he is going into detail on syntax is that the syntax > of your original post was less than clear. I still don't really know > what you mean, other than (thanks to some clarification) the 2.6 > kernel is faster that the 2.4 kernel for some of your applications. > Which applications, no-one knows. I'm not sure what the problem is here. I understood the message from "Gerald" perfectly -- correctly detecting that by "internal s/w", he meant that he has access to "it" via internal (i.e. psychic) shortwave radio transmission, and partial "source code" for decrypting the transmissions (which, I assume, are masked in all the typical ways -- appearing as seemingly innocuous background conversations, noises heard on trains, coded television commercials, etc). Most of us here are all old hands at this stuff and "Gerald" was right to assume that we could infer what he was really talking about. Just as we can realize that when he wrote: "If Any more Q`s , lets take it off line" ...he was encoding the phrase "IAS space". Notice the capital A in his "Any", and the backtick (as in, BACKtick) where any non-idiot would normally put an apostrophe, and the SPACE character between the "s" and the comma. So the decoded message is "let's continue this discussion in IAS space", referring of course to secure psychic ultra-low-frequency s/w radio communication in the IAS communication plane. So no need to beat this into the ground any further. I think "Jim" was just quizzing "Gerald" to make sure that he really meant psychic ultra-low-frequency s/w radio communication, and was not just some g-man or whatever who had stumbled onto the codes and had joined the list to fish for information. --MikeAttachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- References:
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Gerald Naughton
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] MySQL and utf8 Japanese characters. Again. [SOLVED]
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links