Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp
Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:43:02 -0400
- From: Jim <jep200404@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- References: <20060427073728.2e126839.jep200404@example.com> <20060427232520.70354.qmail@example.com>
Gerald Naughton wrote: [> Jim wrote:] > > I'm focusing on the word "internal". > > > > By "internal", did you mean that the program > > was developed _internally_ by your company? > > No , it wasn`t our internal s/w developed by > our company What _did_ you mean by "internal s/w"?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Gerald Naughton
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- References:
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Gerald Naughton
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Linux Filesystems Comparison Article
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |