
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] [100% off topic] Telescope...
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:03:12 +0900
- From: "Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon" <ronfaxon@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [100% off topic] Telescope...
- References: <43DC3351.4080304@example.com>
- Organization: Images Through Glass
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
bruno raoult wrote:
>I had a dream a couple of years ago: To watch stars & planets... I went
>to US (where telescopes are cheap) but failed to come back with anything...
>I am looking again to buy a telescope. An easy one, GPS and Equatorial
>mandatory, then: I will not spend hours to find stars, I just want to
>enjoy watching them...
>
>Apparently, Celestron and Meade are leaders (price/performance), but I
>am really a beginner, so I am not sure.
>
>
I'm not involved in star-gazing directly, but I have an acquaintance who
drives out to Ibaraki (I think he said Ibaraki - either that or... um...
Fukushima?) every clear weekend for pictures. He has a telescope that
tracks the stars during long exposures and then he uses some special
software to put together the cumulative effect of three or four
exposures for some really amazing pictures. (Why not just one long
exposure? - Apparently an overly long exposure with a digital camera
produces electronic noise - thus the multiple exposures and the need to
put them together later in the computer.) Unfortunately, he's using
MicroMuck though.....
Lyle
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index