Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:13:29 -0500
- From: Jim <jep200404@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- References: <ea4e853e0601222007h26e01d9et2155691730b149e6@example.com><d8fcc0800601222029i436fb35fq@example.com><ea4e853e0601222046m39800788jb474d8d88b7749d8@example.com><d8fcc0800601222118g3deb34a5p@example.com><d8fcc0800601222120u1cb5a448q@example.com><ea4e853e0601222204h4693ab80o2d63a928826acc36@example.com>
Lyle H Saxon wrote: > arecord > RIFF$WAVEfmt @example.com WAVE 'stdout' : Unsigned 8 bit, Rate 8000 Hz, Mono 8kHz is a low sampling rate, good for saving bytes 8 bit samples are also good for saving bytes Is arecord outguessing you? Is arecord looking at the 8 bit samples and 8kHz sampling rate and trying to "help" you further save bytes by recording in Mono? If arecord is saying Mono, then crummy stereo connectors are not the issue.
- Follow-Ups:
- [tlug] Stereo Recording: Try 44.1kHz with 16 bit samples (Re:KRecord (Mono?))
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- From: Lyle H Saxon
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- Next by Date: [tlug] Stereo Recording: Try 44.1kHz with 16 bit samples (Re:KRecord (Mono?))
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] KRecord (Mono?)
- Next by thread: [tlug] Stereo Recording: Try 44.1kHz with 16 bit samples (Re:KRecord (Mono?))
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links