Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:41:08 +0900
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- References: <20060114.174541.46101935.psbfan@example.com> <87zmlx7un1.fsf@example.com> <d8fcc0800601150328g1e2d7e99q@example.com> <20060116.105541.46098120.psbfan@example.com>
On 16/01/06, Toshiyuki Ishii <psbfan@example.com> wrote: > > On 15/01/06, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote: > > > > > This isn't exactly a kernel hackers group. There are a few such here, > > > but it's unlikely that they're familiar with every little bit. > > I'm so sorry for disturbing the list. No, you are not disturbing the list; Steve was merely pointing out that your question might not get answered here. All Linux / UNIX / Open Source-related questions are welcome. Says so right in our List Policy doc. :) http://tlug.jp/listpolicy.php#about If you ask a question that most people don't care about, they can just instruct their MUA to ignore the thread, so no problem. > > You should, however, take Steve's advise about what info you need to > > provide so that we can help you. [...] > > I will assume that you are concerned with the 2.6 kernel. > > I use 2.6.13 kernel. > I have behaved rudely not to present information about my question. No, not rudely. You just were not aware, perhaps, of the requirements for getting help on a erai technical mailing list such as TLUG. ;) Seriously, Steve was educating you for your own good, not scolding you. He tends to only scold those of us who should know better, and ignore annoying newbies who lack a Clew. (Sorry, couldn't resist the Baroque spelling; I guess I should read less Neal Stephenson!) So if Steve suggests something to you, you must not fit in the annoying clueless newbie category. The fact that you are asking a question about a pretty low-level bit of the kernel would provide more evidence to support that fact. :) > > I first made an identifier search on LXR against the 2.6.11 source > > tree to find the relevant code: OK, let's see if I can find 2.6.13 in LXR... Not on the main page, but Google found another LXR instance here: http://www.linux-m32r.org/lxr/http/source/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c?v=2.6.13 > And the code I have qestion is just what/where? you pointed out. > (I left out your citation because I should disturb the list again.) Maybe I misunderstand your question, but your code is here: http://www.linux-m32r.org/lxr/http/source/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c?v=2.6.13#L542 (Looks like it moved a few lines down in the jump from 2.6.11 to .13) > As another version and another patch level kernel uses the same code, I found, > I thought that probably I was misunderstanding. The conditions seem not to have changed any, so my explanation should hold. For the sake of the archives, please do reply and let the list know whether I was correct or not. :) Cheers, Josh
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- From: Toshiyuki Ishii
- References:
- [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- From: Toshiyuki Ishii
- Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- From: Toshiyuki Ishii
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Nasty Problem: searching for strings that span newlines
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] about sanitize_e820_map()
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links