Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tlug] In-Reply-To CFWS



Hmmm. There sure is much in those headers. 
Thanks for showing the whole header. 

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:33:43 +0100 Godwin Stewart <godwin.stewart@example.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:26:47 -0500, Jim <jep200404@example.com> wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps Stephen J. Turnbull replied both privately to Godwin Stewart and 
> > publicly to the list, so that you saw the CFWS unmolested by the list, 
> > but everyone else saw only the reply that went through the list 
> > and had the CFWS stripped out. I would expect that Godwin Stewart 
> > actually got two replies from Stephen J. Turnbull. Perhaps Gmail 
> > seeming duplicates. 
> 
> Hmm...
> 
> The mail I have here indicates that it originated from hikari.tlug.jp. So,
> unless SJT has an account on that machine, it is list traffic. It also
> contains the usual RFC2369 headers indicating that it is list traffic:
> 
> Delivered-To: godwin.stewart@example.com
...
> Received: from hikari.tlug.jp (hikari.tlug.jp [219.120.149.100])
>         by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h19si4554972wxd.2005.12.23.04.49.19;
>         Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:49:25 -0800 (PST)
> Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: best guess record for domain of tlug-request@example.com designates 219.120.149.100 as permitted sender)

Cute. I've never seen a Received-SPF record before. 
Now that I look, I see a _few_ in old email. 

> Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hikari.tlug.jp)
> 	by hikari.tlug.jp with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
> 	id 1EpmMD-0002LT-CF; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:13 +0900
> Received: (from slist@example.com)
> 	by hikari.tlug.jp (8.12.11/8.12.6/Submit) id jBNCnDrO017207;
> 	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:13 +0900 (JST)
> Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:06 +0900 (JST)

It sure looks like that is the public reply. 

> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:49:05 +0900
> In-Reply-To: <20051223120416.346039cc.godwin.stewart@example.com> (Godwin
>  Stewart's message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:04:16 +0100")

Hmmm. Perhaps something between tlug and me gobbled the CFWS. 

Looking through old mail, I see that CFWS in email to me 
stopped some time ago. That would point to my ISP 
(or their feed). 

> Message-ID: <871x042d32.fsf@example.com>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links