Re: [tlug] and, back to gpg

[Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@example.com>]

On Æü, 2004-08-15 at 14:30 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 01:13:00PM -0500, Stuart Luppescu wrote:
> > On ??, 2004-08-15 at 09:56 +0200, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> > > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:37:43 -0400, Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Well, hope this is useful to someone--I can now sign emails to my users
> > > > though none of them would even notice or doubt an unsigned email.
> > > 
> > > They'll probably think that the digital signature is some kind of virus :o)
> > 
> > Not a joke. Whenever I send signed messages to the AERA (American
> > Educational Research Association) mailing list, I get a message back
> > saying messages with attachment type application/pgp-signature are
> > forbidden by the list. Some day I'll remember to not sign anything I
> > post to that list....
> 
> Right, and that's why I have begun using the inline sig option when
> posting to anything on a yahoogroups list and the like.   :)

Hmmm. Inline sig. Evolution doesn't have that option, nor does it put
the nice little wax seal graphic on messages received with inline sigs.
»ÄÇ°.
-- 
Stuart Luppescu       -=- s-luppescu .at. uchicago.edu
University of Chicago -=- CCSR 
$B:MJ8$HCRF`H~$NIc(B    -=- Kernel 2.6.5-gentoo              
"... deteriate (deteriorate) ... hayenous (heinous) ... vented 
 (vetted) ..."  George W. Bush May 14, 2001 Mispronunciations
 committed during one informal press conference at the White
 House.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part